Hypothetical
Opinion No. 84-1
BEFORE
THE NEVADA COMMISSION ON ETHICS
In
the Matter of Hypothetical Opinion Request of Public Officer
The
Nevada Ethics Commission issues this opinion in accord with NRS 281.511(1)(b).
One
member of a multi-member state body has requested the advice of this Commission.
The requester is a public officer within the meaning of NRS 281.431(11).
The requester does not perform any legislative functions within the
meaning of NRS 281.431(7) and therefore is a member of the executive branch as
defined in NRS 281.431(8).
The
requested has provided documents and testimony to the Commission that establish
that the requester is a member of a multi-members state body which administers a
program of grants to individuals, organizations and institutions for programs
and services that further the objectives of the state body.
The requester has been employed in a salaried management capacity by a
private nonprofit concern which is not presently eligible for grants from the
state body. The private nonprofit
concern may become eligible for grants from the state body at a future date.
Initial capitalization for this private nonprofit concern came from two
other private organizations. One of
these organizations received a special grant from the state body which could not
and was not used to partially capitalize the private nonprofit concern.
The second organization received no grants from the state body.
The requester’s employment with the private nonprofit concern is
presently scheduled to end before the concern becomes eligible for grant
assistance from the state body.
The
documents provided the Commission also establish that the state body has
established internal policies regarding conflict of interest which prohibit a
member of that body from submitting a grant application to that body.
These internal guidelines allow participation by members of the state
body in activities funded by the state body’s grants but prohibit members from
receiving remuneration from grant funds administered by grant recipients of this
state body. A member of the state
body with a conflict of interest must not participate in any discussion,
deliberation or action on a grant application for which the member has a
conflict of interest.
The
Commission finds that the requester’s employment, as presently scheduled, by
the private nonprofit concern does not contravene the guide for conduct
contained in NRS 281.481(1) because it expires prior to the private nonprofit
concern’s becoming eligible to apply for and receive grants from the state
body which would fund the salary paid to an employee of this private nonprofit
concern employed in the requester’s management capacity.
The
Commission may, in rendering an advisory opinion pursuant to NRS 281.511(1),
give guidance to the requester on the issues enumerated in NRS 281.521.
The Commission chooses to give this guidance in the circumstances of this
request. The Commission concludes
that if the state body were to change its present grant guidelines to make the
private nonprofit concern immediately eligible to apply for and receive a grant
from the state body or if the private nonprofit concern extended the
requester’s salaried employment into the concern’s eligibility period for
such grants and the private nonprofit concern applied for a grant from the state
body under either of these circumstances, a conflict would occur within the
meaning of NRS 281.521(1), (2), and (3) if the requester were to participate as
a member of the state body in the decision on such a grant. Participation by the requester in the state body’s decision
on a grant in the circumstances described in the preceding sentence which
resulted in approval of the grant which was to be used in whole or in part to
fund the requester’s salary received from the private nonprofit concern would
be contrary to NRS 281.481(1) and the internal guidelines of the state body
issued on this point which the Commission finds in this respect to be no less
restrictive than NRS 281.421(1). See,
NRS 281.541(1).
It
is the opinion of the Commission that the employment of the requester by the
private nonprofit concern and concurrent membership on the state body does not
contravene the provisions of NRS 281.481(1) given the scheduled duration of that
employment and the existing grant guidelines of the state body which render the
private nonprofit concern ineligible to apply for and receive a grant from the
state body which could be sued to defray all or part of the requester’s salary
during the scheduled period of employment.
This opinion is subject to modification as described in the preceding
paragraph if any of the conditions described in that paragraph occur.
NEVADA
COMMISSION ON ETHICS